Travel chaos threatens Iraq’s place in the World Cup playoffs
· The Independent

· The Independent

· Yahoo Sports
The NHL Trade Deadline always comes full of surprises. Stanley Cup contenders swap star players, while tanking teams look towards the draft and fire-sale any viable player they have.
Visit extract-html.com for more information.
Last year’s deadline saw many exciting transactions take place. Mikko Rantanen (after a short stint with the Carolina Hurricanes) was traded to the Dallas Stars. Logan Stankoven found a new home with the Hurricanes.
With such an exciting deadline to the 2024-2025 season, you would think the Utah Mammoth participated in it as well. Well, not exactly. Last season, the Mammoth only made one big trade.
Trading for Olli Maatta from the Detroit Red Wings (early in the season) was about as exciting as it got for the team. They had the assets to go all in on a huge acquisition, but General Manager Bill Armstrongelected to wait and see how far the team could go with the talent they already had.
This trade deadline sounds to be shaping up very differently. Rumors suggest the Mammoth front office is going to be very aggressive this season to acquire big talent at the deadline. It sparks the question: Who should the Mammoth trade for?
The @utahmammoth could be major players ahead of Friday's #NHLTradeDeadline.@TheFourthPeriod talked about what he's hearing on #NHLNow.
: NHL Network's coverage of the 2026 NHL Trade Deadline begins Friday at 10a ET! https://t.co/38UKmJKK8Qpic.twitter.com/onWjFS4U1k
— NHL Media (@NHLMedia) March 3, 2026
Ryan O’Reilly is an interesting candidate for the Mammoth. At 34 years old, the centerman definitely would be the old man in the room if the Mammoth were to pull the trigger. O’Reilly would bring goal-scoring and major experience (both of which are necessary to make a deep playoff run) to the team.
He won the Frank J. Selke trophy in 2019 for his astounding year with the St Louis Blues – a Blues team that won the Stanley Cup that year, built by the current Mammoth general manager Armstrong. The Mammoth needs center depth and having a center with 18 seasons of experience could prove invaluable, especially if the Mammoth are going up against highly decorated veteran playoff teams.
Last season Ryan O'Reilly became a #StanleyCup champion and won the Conn Smythe and Selke Trophy.
Watch his highlights and you'll see why. pic.twitter.com/7jyofrodpi
— NHL (@NHL) September 11, 2019
O’Reilly has the third-most goals scored (21 goals) and is tied for first in assists (37 assists) on the Nashville Predators. He might come cheaper than other candidates on this list, having one year left on his deal. With a team trying to find consistency, a Stanley Cup legend could be the key ingredient they need for a magical cup run.
Another name the Mammoth could look into is Nazem Kadri. The Flames are looking for a suitor for Kadri, another Stanley Cup champion, as they sit with a record of 24-28-7.
NAZEM KADRI AGAIN, THIS TIME IN OVERTIME! FLAMES WIN!#Flamespic.twitter.com/dPKtrQlQKP
— Hockey Daily 365 l NHL Highlights & News (@HockeyDaily365) March 26, 2025
With rebuild written all over the wall for the franchise, they’ll look to dump some of their veteran players. Though he’s not scoring as many goals as he did last season, Kadri makes up for it with assists (29 assists this season).
If the Mammoth snagged Kadri at the deadline, they would hope to restore him to his 2021 form, when he scored 28 goals and 59 assists. The center, much like O’Reilly, could provide much-needed seniority on the young Mammoth team.
Kadri earned his keep for the Avalanche team that won the Stanley Cup in 2022, scoring seven goals and eight assists during that playoff run. Besides experience, the Mammoth would have him for three more years under his current contract. However, the Flames would want Mammoth prospect Tij Iginla in return, and Armstrong doesn’t seem too keen on giving up his top prospects too easily.
Kadri also stated that he wants to be on a contender, which the Mammoth aren’t right now — unless Kadri himself can elevate the team’s game to a whole new level.
The Mammoth are heavily rumored to trade for Robert Thomas from the Blues. The Blues are finally waving the white flag, accepting that a rebuild looms over the horizon. Thomas could be an amazing piece for the Mammoth. The 26-year-old center fits the Mammoth’s young timeline and would contribute to much-needed goal scoring and assist-making.
Robert Thomas just set a new career-high with a four-game goal streak. #stlbluespic.twitter.com/8szSIs6V4S
— St. Louis Blues (@StLouisBlues) November 8, 2023
Last season, Thomas scored 81 points off 21 goals and 60 assists. Though he’s not quite on a Clayton Keller level of point production, he could thrive on a team with multiple goal scorers like Dylan Guenther. Plus, the young center has experience winning a Stanley Cup. He aided the aforementioned O’Reilly in achieving their goal of winning the cup in the center’s very first year of NHL play.
Thomas may seem like a no-brainer when it comes to a deal; however, past injuries have plagued his career. To make matters more complicated, Thomas is in the third year of an eight-year-long contract extension.
Reports indicate the Blues want three major assets in return – whether it be a high draft pick, a top-15-picked prospect, or a young up-and-coming talent, all packaged together. A high price for a player yet to break the 90-point barrier. Though Thomas would raise the floor for the Mammoth, would he be worth the payout of much of their young prospect talent, and say a Barrett Hayton?
Jason Robertson should be another name GM Armstrong monitors. With contract negotiations falling short, Robertson could look to another team to pay his bill. It would take a hefty amount of assets and probably one of the Mammoth’s great players to get the American left wing. However, Robertson would more than make up for the price with his offensive output.
That's a natty hatty for Jason Robertson!
He now has six goals and nine points in his last three games! pic.twitter.com/ZV04cLZnia
— NHL (@NHL) November 16, 2025
The young wing in the 2022-23 season put up 109 points on 46 goals and 63 assists. This season, Robertson already scored 34 goals and 36 assists, well on his way to another 80-point season. If the Mammoth could have another bona fide goal scorer on their roster, just imagine how other players like Logan Cooley or Guenther would thrive if the defensive gameplan wasn’t focused on them.
Robertson would more than raise the ceiling for this young Mammoth squad, and at 26 years old, he fits the timeline with the rest of the Mammoth core. It remains a mystery to what it would take to get the player to Utah, and do the Mammoth want to fork out the money to pay him? Some insiders predict that Robertson could ask for a $12 million per-year contract.
The Mammoth’s eager owner, Ryan Smith, might be fine pushing that bill, but what would they have to sacrifice to bring Robertson here? Most likely, a player like a JJ Peterka or a Nick Schmaltz would have to be part of the deal, and is that worth it for the front office to tear apart that chemistry to make that deal?
This is a pivotal trade deadline for the Mammoth to truly solidify themselves as a playoff contender. It’s been almost five years since this club made it into the postseason (not since they were the Arizona Coyotes in 2020).
If the Mammoth wants a chance at winning a playoff series this year, they should trade for an elite veteran talent. Teams like the Florida Panthers moved ahead of schedule when they traded forMatthew Tkachuk.
Perhaps this is the season the Mammoth makes a move for their own kind of Tkachuk to turn around and enter the realm of postseason glory. They’ve already started by trading for defenseman MacKenzie Weegar, and who’s to say they’re done?
Per Elliotte Friedman, the Calgary #Flames have traded MacKenzie Weegar to Utah for three 2026 2nd round picks, Olli Maatta, and prospect Jonathan Castagna. pic.twitter.com/l52jekGFRV
— Daily Faceoff (@DailyFaceoff) March 5, 2026
The post Who Should the Mammoth Target at the NHL Trade Deadline? appeared first on The Lead.
· Fox News

Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby faced tough questions Thursday about President Donald Trump's previous statements about war with Iran.
While Colby was testifying before the House Armed Services Committee, the Democratic ranking member said that the president broke his campaign promise.
Visit sweetbonanza-app.com for more information.
Colby appeared before the House Armed Services Committee on Thursday to testify about the recently-released 2026 National Defense Strategy (NDS). Several lawmakers focused on the U.S.'s Operation Epic Fury, as U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran continue.
"When President Trump was running for office, he said over and over and over again, 'I'm not going to do wars.' In fact, he very specifically said, 'If I'm president, we will not go to war with Iran.' And here we are. So I'm genuinely curious what changed? What changed from when he was a candidate to when he was in office?" Ranking Member Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., said.
BEYOND THE IRAN DEAL: WHY TRUMP’S REFUSAL TO ‘KICK THE CAN’ JUST SAVED GENERATIONS
Smith later asked Colby the question, saying that Trump had routinely implied that "his mere presence and his policies" could prevent wars as part of his "America First agenda." The lawmaker then wondered how that agenda allegedly failed in Iran.
"I think the president sincerely meant that. He sincerely meant, 'you put me in office, I'm going to do things to make sure that we don't go to war with Iran.' He failed. We're at war with Iran," Smith said.
PENTAGON OFFICIAL FLAGS RETURN OF 'COLD WAR MENTALITY,' AS TRUMP ADMIN RESHAPES NATO ALLIANCE
Colby pushed back, saying he did not think that the agenda had failed in Iran, noting Trump's consistency in opposing Iran's development of nuclear weapons. However, the ranking member would not accept that answer and retorted, once again bringing up the president's statements about not going to war.
The Pentagon policy chief later brought up the president's commitment to "peace through strength," citing the peace deals Trump has struck, such as the one in Gaza, as examples of "peace" and saying that what was happening in Iran was the "strength" part.
The lawmaker accepted Colby's answer as "solid enough" before saying that there was "no question that he failed" in light of the launch of Operation Epic Fury.
Colby was not the only one to refute the argument that Trump broke promises by acting in Iran. Rep. Joe Wilson, R-S.C., said that under Trump's leadership, "we're preventing endless wars."
Another lawmaker, Rep. Richard McCormick, R-Ga., asked Colby whether he would consider what is happening in Iran to be "a forever war," to which the Pentagon official said, "No, sir."
Fox News Digital reached out to the White House for comment on Thursday.
Throughout his presidential campaign, Trump said that he would not drag the U.S. into endless wars and also spoke against Iran having a nuclear weapon.
On Wednesday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt refuted what she described as "fake news headlines" suggesting U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran were unjustifiable. She told reporters at the first White House press briefing since Operation Epic Fury began that Iran "is a rogue terrorist regime that has been threatening the United States, our allies and our people for 47 years."
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
"The American people are smart enough to know that. And they've also been smart enough to listen to the president himself, not just over the past year in this second term, but during his first term as president, and also for the past 40 years of his life," Leavitt said. "This is a president who has been remarkably consistent on this issue, that Iran can never obtain a nuclear weapon. And the president tried peace through diplomacy exhaustively and extensively."
"He and his team gave it their best go, and the president ultimately came to the determination of that peace was not a suitable path," she said. "The Iranian regime, they want death. They want destruction. They want to kill Americans. And that's unacceptable to this president. It's intolerable to him as commander in chief."